Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube vs. no Endotracheal Tube
Purpose
This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.
Condition
- Multiple Pulmonary Diseases
Eligibility
- Eligible Ages
- Over 18 Years
- Eligible Genders
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure
Exclusion Criteria
- Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy
Study Design
- Phase
- N/A
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- N/A
- Intervention Model
- Parallel Assignment
- Intervention Model Description
- Patient will be randomized 1:1 to UCETT vs no ETT (current standard procedure) when they scheduled for the EBUS-TBNA procedure.
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- None (Open Label)
Arm Groups
Arm | Description | Assigned Intervention |
---|---|---|
Experimental uncuffed endotracheal group |
|
|
No Intervention no endotracheal tube group/control |
|
Recruiting Locations
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
More Details
- NCT ID
- NCT06799455
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- University of Minnesota