Purpose

This is a comparison of uncuffed endotracheal tube (UCETT) vs. no endotracheal tube (ETT) in endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure under moderate sedation in terms of procedure tolerance, duration of the procedure, desaturation, amount of sedation medication usage.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Genders
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Any patient that is scheduled for EBUS-TBNA procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • Those who are not safe to receive moderate sedation or flexible bronchoscopy

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
N/A
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Patient will be randomized 1:1 to UCETT vs no ETT (current standard procedure) when they scheduled for the EBUS-TBNA procedure.
Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Masking
None (Open Label)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Experimental
uncuffed endotracheal group
  • Device: Endotracheal tube
    participants either receive the ETT during the procedure
No Intervention
no endotracheal tube group/control

Recruiting Locations

University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
Contact:
Isaac Hoff, BS
612-626-7061
hoffx166@umn.edu

More Details

NCT ID
NCT06799455
Status
Recruiting
Sponsor
University of Minnesota

Study Contact

Jamie Heisdorffer
curre024@umn.edu

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.