A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Purpose
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of inhaled pirfenidone (AP01) versus placebo on top of standard of care in participants with PPF over 52 weeks.
Condition
- Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Eligibility
- Eligible Ages
- Over 18 Years
- Eligible Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- Participant meets criteria for PPF, as follows: - In subjects with interstitial lung disease (ILD) of known or unknown etiology other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) who have radiological evidence of pulmonary fibrosis, PPF is defined as: Physiological evidence of disease progression with at least 1 of the following criteria despite treatment with approved or unapproved medications commonly used in practice (per Investigator): 1. Relative decline in FVC ≥10% predicted within the previous 24 months based on documented historical spirometry assessments 2. Relative decline in FVC ≥5% to <10% predicted within the previous 24 months based on documented historical spirometry assessments with at least 1 of the 2 following criteria: - Worsening respiratory symptoms (Note: Changes attributable to comorbidities e.g., infection, heart failure must be excluded) OR - Radiological (HRCT) evidence of disease progression per a local or central radiologist (from historical HRCT taken up to 24 months prior to Screening Visit 1), for example: - Increased extent or severity of traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis - New ground-glass opacity with traction bronchiectasis - New fine reticulation - Increased extent or increased coarseness of reticular abnormality - New or increased honeycombing - Increased lobar volume loss 3. Worsening of respiratory symptoms (Note: Changes attributable to comorbidities e.g., infection, heart failure must be excluded) AND radiological (HRCT) evidence of disease progression per a local or central radiologist - Meeting all of the following criteria during the Screening Period: a. FVC ≥45% of predicted normal at Screening Visit 1, b. Forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1)/FVC ≥0.7 or ≥age-adjusted lower limit of normal at Screening Visit 1, c. Diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥30% of predicted, corrected for hemoglobin at Screening Visit 1, d. Acceptability: Participants can perform acceptable spirometry (i.e., meet American Thoracic Society (ATS)/ European Respiratory Society (ERS) acceptability criteria at both Screening Visits). • For subjects already on nintedanib (up to 30% of subjects): Must have been on nintedanib for at least 6 months prior to Screening with or without dose adjustments and/or drug interruptions during that period. For subjects who have discontinued nintedanib prior to Screening: Must have been off of nintedanib for a minimum of 12 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
- Current treatment with oral pirfenidone or treatment with oral pirfenidone within 3 months prior to Screening. - Elevated liver enzymes and liver injury at Screening defined as: 1. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ˃ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) 2. Bilirubin >2.0 x ULN - Renal disease with a creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min, calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula. Retesting is allowed once. - Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) based on the ATS diagnostic algorithm for IPF. UIP that is not idiopathic, for example related to rheumatoid arthritis (RA), familial interstitial lung disease (ILD), or other is not exclusionary. - Greater extent of emphysema than of fibrotic ILD on HRCT. Note: CT results must be confirmed through the central over read process. - Significant clinical worsening of PPF between Screening - Participants who cannot meet protocol-specified Baseline stability criteria. FVC Baseline stability is defined as the FVC assessments at Visit 3 being within ±12% of the mean of the FVC assessments obtained at the 2 preceding visits. At Visit 3, if the pre-dose FVC is outside of ±12% range, the participant will not be randomized and will be considered a screen failure.
Study Design
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel Assignment
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Arm Groups
| Arm | Description | Assigned Intervention |
|---|---|---|
|
Experimental AP01 High Dose BID |
Pirfenidone Solution for Inhalation |
|
|
Experimental AP01 Low Dose BID |
Pirfenidone Solution for Inhalation |
|
|
Placebo Comparator Placebo BID |
Placebo solution for inhalation |
|
Recruiting Locations
Birmingham 4049979, Alabama 4829764 35205
Phoenix 5308655, Arizona 5551752 85032
Los Angeles 5368361, California 5332921 90033
Los Angeles 5368361, California 5332921 90048
Los Angeles 5368361, California 5332921 90095
Newport Beach 5376890, California 5332921 92663
Redding 5570160, California 5332921 96001
Aurora 5412347, Colorado 5417618 80045
Denver 5419384, Colorado 5417618 80206
Farmington 4834272, Connecticut 4831725 06030
New Haven 4839366, Connecticut 4831725 06519
Leesburg 4161771, Florida 4155751 34748
Ocala 4166673, Florida 4155751 34470
Orlando 4167147, Florida 4155751 32803
Pensacola 4168228, Florida 4155751 32503
Winter Park 4178560, Florida 4155751 32789
Atlanta 4180439, Georgia 4197000 30309
Chicago 4887398, Illinois 4896861 60611
Evanston 4891382, Illinois 4896861 60201
Maywood 4901514, Illinois 4896861 60153
Kansas City 4273837, Kansas 4273857 66160
Baltimore 4347778, Maryland 4361885 21201
Baltimore 4347778, Maryland 4361885 21224
Boston 4930956, Massachusetts 6254926 02215
Ann Arbor 4984247, Michigan 5001836 48109
Minneapolis 5037649, Minnesota 5037779 55455
Rochester 5043473, Minnesota 5037779 55905
Hannibal 4389418, Missouri 4398678 63401
Mount Kisco 5127744, New York 5128638 10549
New York 5128581, New York 5128638 10017
New York 5128581, New York 5128638 10021
New York 5128581, New York 5128638 10029
New York 5128581, New York 5128638 10032
The Bronx 5110266, New York 5128638 10467
Durham 4464368, North Carolina 4482348 27710
Greensboro 4469146, North Carolina 4482348 27403
Statesville 4493316, North Carolina 4482348 28625
Wilmington 4499379, North Carolina 4482348 28401
Winston-Salem 4499612, North Carolina 4482348 27103
Cincinnati 4508722, Ohio 5165418 45267
Cleveland 5150529, Ohio 5165418 44195
Bend 5713587, Oregon 5744337 97701
Portland 5746545, Oregon 5744337 97220
Portland 5746545, Oregon 5744337 97225
Hershey 5193342, Pennsylvania 6254927 17033
Philadelphia 4560349, Pennsylvania 6254927 19107
Philadelphia 4560349, Pennsylvania 6254927 19140
Charleston 4574324, South Carolina 4597040 29406
Charleston 4574324, South Carolina 4597040 29425
Franklin 4623560, Tennessee 4662168 37067
Nashville 4644585, Tennessee 4662168 37204
Dallas 4684888, Texas 4736286 75246
El Paso 5520993, Texas 4736286 79902
Houston 4699066, Texas 4736286 77030
Houston 4699066, Texas 4736286 77030
McKinney 4710178, Texas 4736286 75069
Murray 5778755, Utah 5549030 84157
Salt Lake City 5780993, Utah 5549030 84108
Falls Church 4758390, Virginia 6254928 22042
Seattle 5809844, Washington 5815135 98195
More Details
- NCT ID
- NCT06329401
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Avalyn Pharma Inc.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 2 doses of AP01 (pirfenidone solution for inhalation) versus placebo on top of standard of care in participants with PPF over 52 weeks. Up to 300 eligible participants will be randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms: AP01 high dose, AP01 low dose, or placebo.